Fertility preservation guidelines overlooked by oncologists

Medical Tribune July 2009 P4
David Brill

The majority of US oncologists do not follow recommendations on discussing fertility preservation with cancer patients, a survey shows.

Although seventy nine percent of respondents reported broaching the subject with patients, less than 25 percent referred them to a specialist or provided educational materials.

Just 38 percent were even aware of the existence of the guidelines, issued by ASCO in 2006. [J Clin Oncol 2006 Jun 20;24(18):2917-31]

The findings could prompt the development of new training programs for physicians and nurses, said study author Dr. Gwendolyn Quinn of the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Miami, US.

“We send patients to get wigs before they lose their hair during chemotherapy. We give medications to prevent nausea. Discussing fertility preservation should be something else that we do early in a patient’s care, rather than waiting until infertility occurs,” she said.

The survey was mailed to 1,979 oncologists – 613 of whom completed it. Those working in gynecological oncology and hematological/medical oncology were the most comfortable with having fertility preservation conversations. Physicians’ views of fertility preservation were also a key factor: those with a favorable attitude towards preservation were nearly five times as likely to discuss the options.

The main reason given for avoiding the discussion was that patients were too ill to delay treatment. Of greater concern, however, was physicians who skipped it because they did not believe that the patient was going to survive their cancer, said Quinn.

“It’s the patient’s right. It’s their choice. They may never pursue it, and some of them can’t afford it, but just to be given that information is important, and it’s perhaps not the role of the physician to make decisions. The guidelines say all patients – they don’t specify the healthiest of patients or the ones most likely to survive,” she said.

Even those who do not survive may wish to review their options for “posthumous parenting,” she added, noting that many US couples cryopreserve embryos or sperm for this purpose before beginning treatment.

Quinn acknowledged, however, that there can be many barriers to discussing fertility preservation, including financial constraints for the patient, or a lack of physician resources in certain geographic areas.

“It’s important to bring it up very near to the time of diagnosis, but we understand that it’s an emotional time,” she said. Future training could move the emphasis towards nurses, who may be better placed to have an in-depth discussion with the patient, she added.