Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Statin-associated adverse events under-appreciated, experts say

Medical Tribune April 2009 P11
David Brill

The potential hazards of taking statins may be under-appreciated by the medical community, with adverse reactions often overlooked and sometimes even dismissed, according to US researchers.

Attention has largely focused on the most commonly-reported issue of muscle problems but the full side effect profile is wider than typically thought, they warn.

Cognitive problems are the second most common reaction to statins, followed by peripheral neuropathy-type symptoms, such as numbness and burning, said Dr. Beatrice Golomb, an associate professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD).

Rarer reports have also linked statins to a range of other conditions including sexual dysfunction, glucose elevation and vision problems.

Golomb is head of the Statin Study Group at UCSD, which is currently conducting an observational study looking at the adverse effects of the drugs. She also recently co-authored a literature review which, with almost 900 references, she believes to be the most comprehensive look at the subject to date. [Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2008;8(6):373-418]

“In clinical trials, adverse events look rare. But for those of us who see real-world patients they’re a really big problem,” she told Medical Tribune.

Golomb highlighted a French observational study reporting that 10.5 percent of patients experienced muscle symptoms, and a Danish population-based study which showed that current statin users had a roughly 16-fold increased risk of polyneuropathy compared to non-users. [Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2005 Dec;19(6):403-14; Neurology 2002 May 14;58(9):1333-7] She noted, however, that adverse event rates vary between different studies and populations, making it difficult to provide definitive overall figures.

Meta-analyses, meanwhile, have yielded significant odds ratios of 1.4 and 1.44 for any adverse event on statins (the latter with intensive therapy), although both also recorded substantial clinical benefits. [Clin Ther 2006 Jan;28(1):26-35; Clin Ther 2007 Feb;29(2):253-60]

“I think there is a lack of awareness of these problems from physicians,” added Golomb, pointing to an earlier survey of 650 patients which found that doctors were “more likely to deny than affirm a connection” in cases of adverse statin reactions. [Drug Saf 2007;30(8):669-75]

“Even for patients who met literature criteria for probable or definite causality of their problems, the physicians denied the possibility of a connection about 50 percent of the time for each of the top three best known and most reported symptoms. And when we asked who initiated the conversation it was overwhelmingly the patients, even though it should be the physician who is aware of the connection of those specific symptoms to statins,” said Golomb.

Golomb believes that the most of the problems are class effects, and largely relate to the dose and potency of the statin rather than to any particular brand. Her literature review also notes that mitochondrial mechanisms are implicated in several adverse effects and proposes that this may be a common underlying factor behind a wide range of the problems.

She added that muscle problems occurring with statins are not always associated with a rise in creatine kinase levels, and that this can sometimes cause them to be overlooked.

Other academic authors have reached different conclusions about the risk profile of statins. The most recent such review paper in The Lancet, for example, concluded that statins are “a well-tolerated and extensively studied group of drugs.” [2007; 370:1781-90]

“With a few caveats, and while awaiting good-quality randomized data for the newer drugs, statins seem to be a remarkably safe group of drugs when used at their usual doses,” wrote Dr. Jane Armitage, of the University of Oxford, UK.

Golomb added, however, that the side effects reported so far could be just “the tip of the iceberg,” cautioning that even more problems could ultimately be shown to be related to statins.

“We’ve had reports from patients who have developed accelerated hearing loss or tinnitus with onset of statins. We don’t have data to demonstrate an association but that’s one of the domains in which I predict an association will likely be found in future,” she said.

No comments: